News from the Department of Health and Human Services:
In Windows 10, the Action Center is a flyout panel with information and common (supposedly) actions that you get by clicking the little message icon in the notification area at the lower right of your screen (lower left if you have an RTL language). A sales-language infused explanation is here on Microsoft’s site for Windows (10).
Down in the lower part of the flyout is a collection of “quick actions” – buttons you can hit to bring up common tools like PC Settings and OneNote. One of the common actions is VPN. Evidently Microsoft is expecting them to become a big thing, but my question is:
What is that swirly icon supposed to be? It looks sortof like the Command key on a Macintosh, or maybe this flag from New Zealand. Nothing about it says “virtual private network” to me, nor would I guess that’s what it meant if it was spotted alone in the user interface somewhere.
I have previously mentioned patronizing Project Gutenberg for interesting and entertaining out of copyright works. This one I’ve no comment on the contents of, but am quite struck by the name and cover of.
First, the name. It’s deceptive. It sounds normal at first, but then becomes a quandary. How can you see things at night when, presumably, all is dark? Is it an oxymoron, or a suggestion of a light source?
Second, the cover design. This is what really took my attention. It has a quality that I can’t really explain. The orange on black lettering, the strange font (note the shape of the letter G) and the arching text combine to make me almost frightened of it, like it was designed for Halloween. I wish the contents of the book were as interesting as the cover is.
This new discovery of mine isn’t really new to me, but I just realized that is represents a kind of whimsical reference that you don’t see in “professional” software very often:
The icon for “cloning” (essentially a special duplication procedure) is a sheep. This is undoubtedly a reference to Dolly who was cloned famously in the late 1990s.
Personally I think it’s clever piece of metaphorage. ;) ;)
Playing around with VirtualBox‘s new release (Version 51) I’ve discovered that when you drag and drop a file from your system to the guest system in the virtual machine, you get this as a progress dialog:
I always enjoyed these metaphors of making physical objects out of (mostly) nonphysical objects. I can see in my mind “loading” and “moving” data with a crane. I’ve been doing this since forever: Many many years ago, say 15 or so, I ran across a book of photoshop exercises. I remember the cover, and one of the exercises, was some farmer dude holding canning jars full of… lightning. There were others, but that was the one I remember the most. I loved the idea and the image of being able depict and draw mentally together the real and unreal.
I’m sure the book had some crap with gradients in it too, since it was that time of web design.
- Highly recommended. It’s free and twice as natural. ↩
While looking into the current New Zealand flag change question, I found this wannabe Gantt chart, which I think is hideous.
Here are some problems:
- And worst, the layout is just plain hard to read. Time is the abscissa, but the ordinate is a bunch of categories with arrows pointing here and there.
1A. The entries on the list do not line up with the categories, making it hard to tell who is doing what.
1B. There are multiple colored arrows, complete with dashes and solids, making it hard to tell how many parallel processes there are.
- The thing is mostly made in Microsoft Word/Excel/PowerPoint (I can’t tell which exactly), which isn’t bad, but for some reason, the striped band between 2015 and 2016 is a bitmap and so looks ugly when you get close in.
The colors of the fonts are inexplicable.
“CPG” category has terrible colors and a gradient on each line for some reason!
Overuse of capitals and acronyms. These are a common problem in politiqual work though.
I request that they hire a graphic designer to fix this, or find a bored summer intern (or winter intern since they are down south) to fix this up.
Although the title is something of a misnomer since this “map” is only of the House of Representatives. It is still so very colorful I couldn’t pass it up without bringing it to your attention, if you read this blog.
Original is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USHouseSeatsByStateColor.svg and it is public domain!
I find this map somewhat beautiful, though it might be touched up a little. Anyway, it is quite fascinating unless you have color blindness. If so, this might have been a wasted post. Sorry.
Smashfly is an HR software firm that is used by various large companies. Checking out its website, a little ways down we see a “blue print” of a rocket:
To anyone with a technical background – not even in architecture or “rocket science” – this is just ugly looking. None of these things make any sense as being analogized with a Tom Corbett-ish rocketship. Is “CRM” the nose because it’s the payload? Are employee referrals the only source of “fuel”? I don’t know about CRM, but the last one is clearly not the case.
This doesn’t mean their HR software is terrible, just this one image on their corporate website (which you don’t see if you’re applying for jobs) is.
I have a strange ambivalence about this flag. It’s interesting in its design, but it’s also very strange in a way I can’t name or describe. The previous flag I mentioned here was just amazzing. This one I’m not so sure about…
It is the old flag of the Dutch ruler of what is now Suriname, a land sometimes plagued by military instabilities and overthrows, though not as much as other countries we could mention.
The odd ellipse and the stars are just not normal. It looks like some kind of a corporate logo.
There is a term in physics and somewhat chemistry, the “island of stability”. Essentially as atoms get bigger, they tend to be less stable. That is, they are radioactive and tend to decay into smaller atoms.
Except there is a suspicion that when they are large enough, they might get to be stable again. Here’s a map of this island, with mistakes, from a Wikipedian user:
The mistakes in question are of the proton and neutron numbers, so don’t use this on an exam.
Having said that, it is a beautiful illustration of the concept and the naming conceit. Anyone can see why it is an “island” in speech. The current image is more scholarly, but less attractive.